EarnApp vs Honeygain, measured on one connection
Same machine, same line, same months, both running continuously. Every comparison of these two that I can find is built from the companies' own advertised rates. This one is built from two dashboards I log into.
Measured JUL–SEP 2026 · host Geekom GT1 Mega, 24/7
Line 30 Mbps, region Ohio, US, residential · n=1
The numbers
Three months now, and the answer changed in the third.
Honeygain: $6.77 in July, $5.25 in August, $7.39 in September, for $19.41. EarnApp: $2.98, then $5.39, then $4.62, for $12.99.
In August EarnApp edged ahead by fourteen cents and I wrote that up as a possible divergence while saying plainly that fourteen cents is not a result. September settled it. Honeygain climbed 41% to its best month yet and EarnApp fell 14%, putting Honeygain $2.77 ahead on the month and $6.42 ahead cumulatively.
So the honest summary is that Honeygain earns more on this connection, and the August crossover was noise. I am leaving the original reasoning below rather than rewriting history, because a comparison site that silently edits its earlier calls is worth nothing.
What I thought was happening, and why it didn't hold
After August I argued the two apps might be diverging because they no longer pay for the same thing: Honeygain by traffic, EarnApp reportedly on a time basis that pays an always-on host for availability rather than volume. That would predict EarnApp holding steady when demand dips while Honeygain falls with it.
September contradicts it. Demand evidently recovered, since gross across the whole stack rose slightly, and Honeygain captured that recovery while EarnApp did not. If EarnApp were genuinely paying for uptime it should have been flat rather than down 14%, because the machine's uptime did not change.
One month does not disprove a model any more than one month proved it. But the hypothesis is weaker than it looked, and I would rather say that than quietly drop it. The reported hourly-rate change remains something I have seen in one source and not in Bright Data's own documentation.
The thing that actually decides this
Per-month earnings are the wrong metric, and this is where almost every comparison of these two goes wrong. What matters is how long until money is actually in your account, and on that measure it is not close.
At my three-month average of $6.47 a month, Honeygain's $20 minimum takes about 3.3 months to reach from zero. At $4.33 a month against a $2.50 minimum, EarnApp clears its threshold in under three weeks.
So the app earning less has paid out repeatedly in the window where the app earning more has paid nothing at all. I started Honeygain in July and I am still waiting, with November the realistic estimate. If you are deciding between these two and you want to see money rather than a rising dashboard number, that gap matters more than any per-gigabyte rate either of them advertises.
One caveat on EarnApp's threshold: I have seen it quoted at $1, $2.50, $5 and $10 across four sources published within months of each other, and one of those was a competitor's page. I use $2.50 because that is what my dashboard showed, and you should check yours rather than trusting any of us.
What this is not
One host, one country, three months. Demand for residential IP addresses varies enormously by region and US addresses sit near the top of that range, so these figures do not transfer to a connection in another country. A three-month sample is barely enough to distinguish a trend from noise, as August demonstrated by reversing in September.
What it is: a controlled comparison. Same hardware, same line, same window, both running the entire time. That is the one thing a rate card cannot give you, and it is the reason this page exists. I will update it monthly, including if it reverses.
Questions
Which should I install if I'm only running one?
It depends which you mean by better. Honeygain earns more here, by $6.42 across three months. EarnApp pays out sooner, because its minimum is low enough to clear in weeks while Honeygain's $20 still hadn't paid out at the 1 October reading, three months in. If you want the larger number, Honeygain. If you want to actually see money while you decide whether this is worth continuing, EarnApp.
Can I just run both?
Yes, and I do. They do not forbid it. But they are reselling the same IP reputation to an overlapping set of buyers, so the combined total is well below the sum of the two. Adding the second one does not double anything.
Why not use the advertised per-GB rates to compare?
Because a rate is a price, not an income. What you earn is the rate multiplied by traffic that actually gets routed to you, and nobody advertises the second number. Repocket has the highest advertised rate in my stack and sits in the middle on actual payout.